Out of courtesy of Bank of India staffers, the bank which is known to be nodal bank for implementation of public schemes, Indians are blessed with ease of doing business.
Evidence:
COMPLAINT TO THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA REGARDING BANK OF INDIA ATTORNEY'S CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT.
Goonda Tax realization letter by a Bank of India attorney claiming it to be legal notice which is never a legal notice and has no attributes of a legal notice, and can never be termed a legal notice.
The threat letter in the garb of legal notice states of legal action against me which I dared them to do but despite so called notice no legal move???? No notice is open ended it has to be a tenured notice with deadline. It had no deadline as it was merely issued to threaten. Now if they move to court with this threat letter as legal notice court is not fool, as no deadline is there they cannot move to court before deadline. No deadline means never move to court. Bank of India babus corruption is also spoiling other fraternities, including the most dignifiable ones that of lawyers.
The threat letter also talks of incidents that never happened and there is no record or evidence of them. They are merely hypothetical. That is why CCTV footage was asked in my RTI petition which was denied and time was let to pass by so that the CCTV footage gets deleted after specified time, this act is also punishable under destruction and concealment of evidence. If their hypothetical statements were true they would better preserve the CCTV footage and present it as a proof of their innocence and for allegations against me. No information at all given under Right to Information which means Indians have no right to information but the corrupt NPA creators have right to privacy of their corrupt deeds.
Now when the condition of nodal bank is excellent, let aside other PSBs.
This is what is called Legal Notice, and is with deadline, and hence I have approached against them in Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court for First Information Report despite police took something and defended them. They cannot move to court with letter of threat as it has no deadline so no court for it. It was never intended for court it was intended to issue threat. Court will never accept it as only passage of deadline of notice court can accept. So it can never amount to notice, but threat.
This is how public is fooled. Ignorance is dangerous.
Petition under the Right to Information Act 2005, RTI is also a constitutional fundamental right of Indian citizen, but giving information under it endangers India as bank of India staff says denying information. It is same bank the corruption of which was exposed by RTI petition's response to a newspaper, since then they have this excuse. Constitutional Fundamental Right killed in India. If it is in India anywhere, whither?
Several loans were given and after that loan accounts closed with bogus IDs of borrowers, also IDs of previous borrowers were used and NPAs created and bailed out of MSME corpuses and the borrowers had no information of it. All money was gobbled up by Bank of India Staff. Now that is why they never give RTI response and call it National threat. This means if an Indian entrepreneur wants information about Bank's corruption its national threat.
Bank of India's staff response to RTI petition, not of the bank. Banks are supposed to work in a way and staff works otherwise for minting money for themselves and their families in close association with RBI and other agencies. Openly and brazenly violating all laws of land and the genuine beneficiaries suicide which is the sole reason of massive suicide of farmers and labourers in India.
REASON OF FARMERS SUICIDE IN INDIA
The ease of doing business in India is so much that if one tried they will not get any righteous loan but will threaten their own lives and seek protection, which they will never get. This is petition made to the District Magistrate of Lucknow to award protection but of no avail. Now who will contend corruption and what else is left except suicide.
As MSME sector is government priority sector so is agriculture. When farmer takes loan of 500 thousand he gets merely about 300 thousand due to the grace of corrupt bank babus. Now, he has to repay all 500 thousand. Above that the interest is payable on all 500 thousand. But they have only 300 thousand in all to apply in agriculture. Now why the hell not his borrower account turn NPA? Now after NPA they will get recovery notice and harassment, and yet he will never be able to repay for principal and interest on 500 thousand as he in all got only 300 thousand to earn. Now what is left at their disposal? We all know. The bank babus from Branch Head to Head office share the cream of farmers' corpses.
Absurd response to Prime Minister's Office by Bank babus. Not even insane can write like this. This is what they have made of India.
COMPLAINT TO PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE
Complain against corrupt Bank of India
babus to PMO.
Babus make mockey.
Return Letter or what, no status of this letter at all........
Letter for rectification of clerical errors in
Loan Application. Bank of India Branch Head
babu was denying to accept it as well but after requests did as he knew complaints are being made.
No disposal letter has been issued yet as this return letter was sent citing fraudulent reason that I did not present any viability as they asked, while they had never asked anything but just wanted to close application as returned as that they do not need to lodge it in the bank's books. Rejections have to be lodged, not returns. return means no application ever made to bank and there remain no records.
It was on the cunning notion by the bank
babu that the applicant firm will consider it as rejection and the get away from bank. This happens with all as thi is their modus operandi and then rejections never come on records and then it can be never proved that MSE unit was killed by the bank in violations of several laws of land, and as there are no records due to return the corrupt remain safe.
Ignorance is dangerous.
Bank of India staffer was no allowing
MSME Loan Application at the branch for which complaint was made to Directorate General of Institutional Finance. Then application was accepted but criminally returned and reject. No proper rejection letter was given. Only illegal demand of money letter was sent through their attorney or counsel.
